Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation — Stock Comparison
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Lam Research Corporation narrowly edges Applied Materials, Inc. on Q·Score (7.9 vs 7.7 out of 10), led by Growth (9.6 vs 7.9) and Sentiment (8.2 vs 8.1). Applied Materials, Inc. scores higher on Valuation, reflecting stronger P/E and price-target positioning. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for LRCX (-15.2%) than for AMAT (-20.3%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Clean balance sheet with low leverage (0.3× debt-to-equity).
⚠ consensus analyst target is below current price.
Earnings growing 41% year-over-year on 24% revenue growth.
⚠ elevated valuation at 50× forward P/E.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAT vs LRCX: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores 7.9/10 versus Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 7.7/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: AMAT or LRCX?
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores higher on Growth (9.6/10 vs 7.9/10). Applied Materials, Inc. reports revenue growth (11.4% YoY) while Lam Research Corporation reports (23.8% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is AMAT or LRCX more attractively valued?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Valuation (3.8/10 vs 2.9/10). AMAT trades at 41.0× P/E versus LRCX at 50.2×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about AMAT vs LRCX?
There are 35 analysts covering AMAT with a consensus price target of $532.34, and 31 analysts covering LRCX with a consensus target of $340.58. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: AMAT or LRCX?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Quality (9/10 vs 9/10). Net profit margin: AMAT at 29.3%, LRCX at 30.9%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: AMAT or LRCX?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Financial Health (9.4/10 vs 9.4/10). Market beta: AMAT at 1.67, LRCX at 1.87. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of AMAT and LRCX?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a market capitalisation of $530.4B, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a market cap of $502.5B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do AMAT or LRCX pay dividends?
AMAT pays a dividend yield of 0.32%, while LRCX pays a dividend yield of 0.26%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →