Applied Materials, Inc. vs NVIDIA Corporation — Stock Comparison
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Applied Materials, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation are evenly matched on Q·Score (9.2/10 each). NVIDIA Corporation scores higher on Sentiment, reflecting stronger analyst and market sentiment. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for AMAT (+64.9%) than for NVDA (+55.0%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Consensus analyst target of $627.83 is 65% above current price.
Clean balance sheet with low leverage (0.2× debt-to-equity).
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAT vs NVDA: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores 9.2/10 versus NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 9.2/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: AMAT or NVDA?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Growth (9.5/10 vs 9.5/10). Applied Materials, Inc. reports revenue growth (24.8% YoY) while NVIDIA Corporation reports (105.9% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is AMAT or NVDA more attractively valued?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Valuation (9.7/10 vs 8.7/10). AMAT trades at 20.6× P/E versus NVDA at 13.3×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about AMAT vs NVDA?
There are 36 analysts covering AMAT with a consensus price target of $627.83, and 58 analysts covering NVDA with a consensus target of $328.95. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: AMAT or NVDA?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Quality (9/10 vs 9/10). Net profit margin: AMAT at 30.1%, NVDA at 63.7%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: AMAT or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) scores higher on Financial Health (9.7/10 vs 9.4/10). Market beta: AMAT at 1.59, NVDA at 2.22. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of AMAT and NVDA?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a market capitalisation of $302.2B, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a market cap of $5.13T. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do AMAT or NVDA pay dividends?
AMAT pays a dividend yield of 0.56%, while NVDA pays a dividend yield of 0.47%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →